by Helen Tansey at T-Room.us
Since the assassination of TPUSA’s founder and CEO Charlie Kirk, most everyone has focused their attention on the lone gunman theory.
Well the evidence by podcaster Baron Coleman is rather compelling. Coleman sincerely raises the question – Was Charlie electrocuted rather than being shot. It’s stunning new details Coleman is introducing to the public for the first time which certainly raises the possibility.
Candidly, after viewing the assassination more than I care to admit, the questions about his t-shirt rising up and down and up again along with his necklace being ripped away from his neck “fits” a body convulsing from some sort of powerful wave running through it which a gun shot can’t explain.
You have to watch Coleman, who is an attorney, lay-out the evidence of the possibility that Charlie may have been electrocuted. Why? A 30-06 would have splattered his head, his body. No man is made of steel no matter how much spinach he eats. Seriously. Get real.
I know this sounds crazy but that’s because the public has been working off of the official narrative we’ve been fed. Our eyes have been diverted to a gunshot so as not to pay the slightest bit of attention to any other possibility.
The images you will see in Coleman’s video is Charlie’s hands and forearms are seared. His wedding ring is displaced. Then he has two queer puncture marks on his forearm. If he was shot, as is the official narrative, then somebody needs to explain why his hands and forearms are seared with two puncture wounds side-by-side on his forearm.
WATCH: