• News Categories
    ▼
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

T-Room

The Best in Alternative News

  • News Categories
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

May 13, 2024 at 6:00 pm

NYC Lawyer Sparks Probe into Judge Arthur Engoron over Unsolicited Advice on $455M Civil Fraud Case…

Arthur_Engoron_NY_Daily_News
ParlerGabTruth Social

by Priscilla DeGregory at New York Post

A controversial Manhattan lawyer — who once had his license suspended for telling a tenant to “commit suicide” — has sparked a state investigation after he claimed to have given the judge in Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial unsolicited advice.

Adam Leitman Bailey — who had his law license suspended for four months in 2019 over the caught-on-tape tirade — claimed to NBC New York that he spoke with Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron about the case three weeks before the judge issued his $455 million ruling against Trump in February.

“I actually had the ability to speak to him three weeks ago,” Bailey told the outlet in a Feb. 16 interview. “I saw him in the corner [at the courthouse] and I told my client, ‘I need to go.’ And I walked over and we started talking … I wanted him to know what I think and why … I really want him to get it right.”

Adam Leitman Bailey3
Lawyer Adam Leitman Bailey’s conversation with the judge overseeing the Trump civil fraud trial has sparked a probe into possible alleged violations by the judge. Tamara Beckwith/NY POST
Judge Arthur Engoron
Bailey claimed he and Judge Arthur Engoron spoke about the case three weeks prior to Engoron’s decision against Trump.AP

The conversation sparked a probe by the New York judicial watchdog organization, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, a source told NBC New York.

A judge can’t “initiate, permit, or consider” communications about cases outside the presence of all parties in the matter.

A judge can “obtain the advice of a disinterested expert,” as long as the parties are told ahead of time and are given the chance to respond, according to the state rules on judicial conduct.

Bailey said he told Engoron his opinion on the fraud statute…

ParlerGabTruth Social
Continue Reading
This website lives off the kindness of your donations. If you would like to support The T-Room please visit our PayPal.

Editor’s Picks

Max Blumenthal Details What’s Happening on the Ground in Both Iran and Israel…

Iran Is Not the United States’ War to Fight…

Court Upholds Tennessee’s Ban on Certain Medical Treatments for Transgender Minors…

Former Intel Officer Drops Truth Bomb – CIA and ODNI Covered Up 2020 CCP Election Interference, Fired Him for Speaking Out…

Tic-Toc Thread on The War on Iran – 4…

Any publication posted at The T-Room and/or opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the views of The T-Room. Such publications and all information within the publications (e.g. titles, dates, statistics, conclusions, sources, opinions, etc) are solely the responsibility of the author of the article, not The T-Room.

Twitter Icon

View Old Archives

Copyright © 2025 T-Room

Site by Creative Visual Design