• News Categories
    ▼
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

T-Room

The Best in Alternative News

  • News Categories
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

March 18, 2024 at 8:03 pm

Justice Jackson Upset That the First Amendment Might Stop the Government From Suppressing Free Speech…

Biden_Harris_Jackson
ParlerGabTruth Social

by Streiff at RedState

The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a potentially groundbreaking case concerning the ability of the federal government to coerce social media platforms into banning opinions and users who disagreed with a government policy. The case is called Murthy v. Missouri, formerly known as Biden v. Missouri.

____________________________

BACKGROUND:

SCOTUS Set to Hear Free Speech Case on Biden Admin Colluding With Big Tech to Stifle ‘Misinformation’

Free Speech Wins: 5th Circuit Upholds Heart of Injunction Against Biden Administration 

KJP and Fauci Ordered to Answer Discovery in Suit Alleging Biden Administration-Social Media Collusion 

MO and LA File Suit Against Biden Administration Over Collusion With Tech Giants to Suppress Free Speech 

Victory for Free Speech: Federal Judge’s Ruling Places Government Censorship in the Crosshairs

Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Censorship Case Against Fauci and Other Biden Official

FBI and White House Slapped Down By Judge in Major Censorship Case

Federal Judge Destroys the Government’s Argument in Favor of Censorship and Educates Them on the First Amendment 


The court seemed skeptical of the arguments proffered by Missouri and Louisiana.

A majority of Supreme Court justices on Monday appeared highly skeptical about claims the Biden administration crossed the line from persuasion to coercion when it told social media platforms to remove problematic content.

At issue is an injunction imposed by a federal judge, currently on hold, that would limit contacts between government officials and social media companies on a wide range of issues.

During oral arguments, justices across the ideological spectrum questioned whether the conduct of government officials was unlawful and whether plaintiffs that brought the lawsuit could even show they were directly harmed. Among the issues raised was the lack of evidence that government officials threatened punitive action if the social media companies failed to cooperate.

While I think the justices were way too deferential to what we all know was going on…

ParlerGabTruth Social
Continue Reading
This website lives off the kindness of your donations. If you would like to support The T-Room please visit our PayPal.

Editor’s Picks

Paramount, Parent Company of CBS, Settles Trump Lawsuit for $16 Million over Election Interference After Editing Kamala Harris’s Answers in 60 Minutes Interview…

MORE: Rubio Officially Shuts Down USAID, Reveals Future Home for Foreign Assistance Programs…

It’s Official: ActBlue Busted — and They’re Cornered with Nowhere to Run…

RFK Jr. Unloads Disturbing Vaccine Secrets on Tucker—and Surprises Everyone on Trump…

RFK Jr. Calls for Truth Commission to Hold Anthony Fauci Accountable…

Any publication posted at The T-Room and/or opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the views of The T-Room. Such publications and all information within the publications (e.g. titles, dates, statistics, conclusions, sources, opinions, etc) are solely the responsibility of the author of the article, not The T-Room.

Twitter Icon

View Old Archives

Copyright © 2025 T-Room

Site by Creative Visual Design