• News Categories
    ▼
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

T-Room

The Best in Alternative News

  • News Categories
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

December 16, 2024 at 7:10 pm

Federal Court Overturns 2020 Decision, Rules GMOs Must Be Regulated…

GMO
ParlerGabTruth Social

by Center for Food Safety at the Defender

In a precedential victory for food and environmental safety, a federal district court ruled on Dec. 3 that genetically engineered (GE) organisms must be regulated. The court’s ruling overturns the 2020 rule overhaul by the first Trump administration that had eliminated most government oversight over GE crops, trees and grasses.

“This is a critical victory on behalf of farmers, the planet, and scientific integrity,” said George Kimbrell, legal director for the lead plaintiff Center for Food Safety, and counsel in the case. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) “tried to hand over its job to Monsanto and the pesticide industry and the Court held that capitulation contrary to both law and science.”

The ruling is a rebuke of the first Trump administration’s efforts to practically eliminate oversight of novel GE technology and instead let industry self-regulate. Previously, nearly all GE plants went through agency approval before experimental planting and again before any commercial use.

Center for Food Safety and allies sued the USDA in 2021 to reverse this rollback, arguing that the rule change violated numerous environmental laws, including the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act and the Plant Protection Act.

The court held that the regulations violated the Plant Protection Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.

The court’s decision sharply criticized the defendant federal agency for its abrupt reversal after more than a decade of recognizing the harms of novel GE technology.

The court at various points held the agency decision was in “direct conflict with the conclusion of its own experts,” and was based on “perception and beliefs” that are merely “asserted as fiat untethered to a clear and sound analysis.”

Despite USDA’s repeated admissions of the need for stronger—not lesser—regulations, the rule unlawfully ignored these concerns of GE crops’ risks.

As such,…

ParlerGabTruth Social
Continue Reading
This website lives off the kindness of your donations. If you would like to support The T-Room please visit our PayPal.

Editor’s Picks

One Survivor Found: Air India Flight Bound for London Crashes Minutes After Take-off with 242 Aboard…

RFK Jr. Announces 8 New Members to CDC Vaccine Advisory Panel…

The Supreme Court Swats Down Discrimination Double Standards…

Secretary Howard Lutnick Outlines U.S. – China Trade Discussion Outcome…

U.S. Begins Evacuating Mideast Embassies, Army Bases as Iran Nuclear Talks Come to a Head…

Any publication posted at The T-Room and/or opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the views of The T-Room. Such publications and all information within the publications (e.g. titles, dates, statistics, conclusions, sources, opinions, etc) are solely the responsibility of the author of the article, not The T-Room.

Twitter Icon

View Old Archives

Copyright © 2025 T-Room

Site by Creative Visual Design