by Paul Alexander at TrialSite News
I argue there is biological and molecular evidence that is clear on why children are effectively COVID immune and can be considered already vaccinated. Yes, already vaccinated and need no COVID vaccine. Leave them alone. COVID injections offer children no opportunity for benefit and only potential opportunities for harms. Children must not be vaccinated with these COVID vaccines, the key issue is they are not needed. No public health official has yet made an argument as to why children are to get these vaccines. Moreover, the developers have not followed the vaccines for the proper duration of time and this is very troubling for we thus do not know what the future will hold for recipients. I am no anti-vaxxer, I support vaccines but they must be properly developed. These were not developed properly in terms of research methodology, the duration of follow-up, the lack of proper safety testing, and the resulting estimates are questionable and especially as to how it is presented to the public. Meant to deceive. The public has been lied to. We have no idea how these will behave longer term in children and it can severely harm our children and may even kill them. Children have a natural protection in that they do not have the molecular and biological basis like adults to be infected and to get severely ill. I am warning the FDA that if they approve this, we run the risk of killing thousands of American children (and global children), harming them with myocarditis and other serious conditions they have been spared of thus far by the natural protection. The vaccine and spike protein is entering the circulation and can have devastating consequences to the vasculature in our children, and may cause clots, bleeding/hemorrhaging etc.
There is no reason for his, no sound reason or justification and the CDC and NIH and NIAID continue to be flat wrong on this! There is no medical reason and I plead with the FDA to stop this. Children are not to protect adults, we do not need immunity from children to close this off. We have early treatment, we must properly double and triple down protect our elderly and high risk and offer treatment early, but we must not disregard the natural immunity already built up in the society. The immunity children already possess. The more recent disaster to children of the dengvaxia vaccine for dengue fever provides caution. Children were seriously harmed from it.
The estimated IFR is close to zero for children and young adults. PANDA reports that the IFR for those <19 years is 0.003%. Levin reported that the estimated age-specific IFR was 0.002% at age 10 and 0.01% at age 25. Comparatively, the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) reported the IFR as follows: 0-4 years, mean 0.003%, 5-9 years, mean 0.001%, 10-14 years, mean 0.001%, 15-19 years, mean 0.003%, 20-24 years, mean 0.006%. The most updated data by the American Academy of Pediatrics showed that “Children were 0.00%-0.19% of all COVID-19 deaths, and 10 [US] states reported zero child deaths. In states reporting, 0.00%-0.03% of all child Covid-19 cases resulted in death.
As to a biological and molecular understanding of the risk, I have brought the evidence together below in a hypothesis that children are already immune and vaccinated. In fact, better than vaccinated with these sub-optimal spike-specific injections that confer a very immature library of immune response. We have strong research by Patel and Bunyavanich (ACE 2 receptor research that showed the limited expression in children), Loske (showing that pre-activated antiviral innate immunity (mucosal compartment) in the upper airways of children),Yang (showing children have memory B cells that can bind to SARS-CoV-2, indicating the potent role of early (prior) childhood exposure to common cold coronaviruses), Weisberg and Farber et al. (showing children T cells are relatively naïve and mostly untrained, and thus a better capacity to respond to novel viruses), and by Galow (showing children do not spread to other children, while it is adults who spread to children).
This is the biological hypothesis that can largely explain the very exceedingly low risk in children as to COVID, but what about the epidemiological observational type studies? There are so many showing the low risk in children but here are a couple of good examples. A high-quality robust study in the French Alps examined the spread of Covid-19 virus via a cluster of Covid-19. They followed one infected child who visited three different schools and interacted with other children, teachers, and various adults. They reported no instance of secondary transmission despite close interactions. These data have been available to the CDC and other health experts for over a year. Ludvigsson published a seminal paper in the New England Journal of Medicine on Covid-19 among children 1 to 16 years of age and their teachers in Sweden. From the nearly 2 million children that were followed in school in Sweden, it was reported that with no mask mandates, there were zero deaths from COVID and a few instances of transmission and minimal hospitalization.
Again, children have a natural ACE 2 protection that has seemingly…
Continue Reading