by Wendi Strauch Mahoney at UnCover DC
Despite evidence of significant harm from the EUA Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, documents and interviews reveal officials in the FDA and the CDC ignored safety signals, critical procedures, and regulations to mandate the shots. A June 24 report from the House Judiciary shows pushing the mandates became more important than recognizing vaccine injuries or reporting truthfully about the safety and efficacy of the EUA vaccine. The vaccine was rushed to market and, in an unprecedented move, the FDA and Dr. Peter Marks “became advocates for the Pfizer vaccine,” not the CDC. It was unprecedented for the FDA to serve in a leading role during a health emergency. The investigation also revealed that the agency operated “outside the proper function of the FDA as authorized by Congress.”
According to the report, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris sought to undermine federal COVID-19 responses during the Trump administration. However, once Biden took office in 2021, his administration allegedly “pressured agencies to go beyond their legal authorities” while it ignored the risks and mandated vaccines for the military and federal employees. The administration also pushed “tactics not supported by science,” such as “universal mask mandates, vaccine mandates, social-distancing mandates, school closures, and censorship.”
Administrative State Ignored Safety Signals and Failed to Test Pfizer mRNA Shots Properly
Most egregiously, the report reveals Peter Marks told the committee in his private interview that “the administrative state mishandled reports of vaccine injury, despite requirements to actively obtain, synthesize, and report feedback on the safety and efficacy of the EUA vaccine. Biases seemed to emerge that discounted evidence of vaccine injury.”
When vaccines are rolled out under EUA authorization and rapid response…
Continue Reading