• News Categories
    ▼
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

T-Room

The Best in Alternative News

  • News Categories
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

August 18, 2023 at 6:07 pm

In Landmark Free Speech Case, Fifth Circuit Judge Likens Government Coercion of Big Tech to ‘Mob’ Boss…

Twitter_Jen_Psaki_Censorship
ParlerGabTruth Social

by John J Vecchione at the Federalist

Whether or not the federal government and its myriad agencies will be able to coerce, cajole, encourage, threaten, and browbeat social media companies into removing views it does not like from their platforms was the question before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals last week.

The government made an expedited appeal of the July 4th order of the district court in Louisiana prohibiting it from directing or commanding social media companies from taking down content the government did not like. In barely a month, the issue was briefed by the parties, including the states of Missouri and Louisiana and individual plaintiffs, Jay Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff, Aaron Kheriaty, Jill Hines, and Jim Hoft, barred from various social media platforms for their statements disliked by the government.

While the parties and the court were concerned with issues of standing and the scope of the injunction, the key issue at the heart of the case was: What protections do Americans have to stop the government from throwing them out of the modern public square of social media by pressuring Big Tech companies to do what the government is absolutely prohibited from doing under the Constitution?

The government’s position at the hearing and throughout the litigation is that it was just talking. It pretends that a long-term effort to threaten social media companies with removing protections from litigation, and new theories or laws regarding anti-trust, and intimidating visits from the FBI starting as early as 2017, coupled with constant hectoring from multiple government actors — with threats always in the background — do not amount to coercion, or even encouragement, of censorship by those companies. This position was met with skepticism by the court…

ParlerGabTruth Social
Continue Reading
This website lives off the kindness of your donations. If you would like to support The T-Room please visit our PayPal.

Editor’s Picks

Biden Has Always Said His Family Didn’t Receive Money from China, But Turns Out Hunter Had over $250k in Payments Sent to His Front Door…

Shocking New Video Shows Hundreds of Migrants Cheering and Waving the Venezuelan Flag on Top of The Beast Cargo Train to the U.S. Border After 11,000 Are Encountered Crossing in Just One Day…

Unprecedented Gold Hoarding by Central Banks Heralds Financial Sea Change…

REPORT: Iranian Regime-Backed ‘Experts’ Worked for Obama/Biden, Got U.S. Govt Clearance…

FTC Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon…

Any publication posted at The T-Room and/or opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the views of The T-Room. Such publications and all information within the publications (e.g. titles, dates, statistics, conclusions, sources, opinions, etc) are solely the responsibility of the author of the article, not The T-Room.

Twitter Icon

View Old Archives

Copyright © 2023 T-Room

Site by Creative Visual Design