• News Categories
    ▼
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

T-Room

The Best in Alternative News

  • News Categories
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

December 15, 2020 at 6:04 pm

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Wuhan Virus Is Not Reason for Voters to Be Exempt from Proving Identity…

Wisconsin_Supreme_Court
ParlerGabTruth Social

The state Supreme Court ruled Monday it is up to Wisconsinites to determine whether they face challenges that allow them to vote absentee without providing a copy of a photo ID.

Under state law, people can vote absentee without showing an ID if they say they are indefinitely confined because of age, disability or infirmity.

Two county clerks this spring contended voters could meet that status because of the coronavirus pandemic and a stay-at-home order issued by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers.

The state Republican Party sued directly with the state Supreme Court and the justices quickly issued an initial order that said the advice from the county clerks was faulty. The clerks rescinded their advice.

In its final decision Monday, the justices concluded it was up to each voter — not clerks or anyone else — to decide when they qualify as indefinitely confined. In addition, they found the pandemic and the stay-at-home order — which has since been struck down — did not render all voters indefinitely confined.

On those points the seven justices were unanimous. But the court’s three liberals dissented on some parts of the majority opinion.

The issue of indefinite confinement was also raised in a lawsuit President Donald Trump brought against election officials after narrowly losing the state to Democrat Joe Biden.

The state Supreme Court ruled in favor of elections officials and Biden in that case later Monday.

“The plain language of (state law) requires that each elector make an individual assessment to determine whether he or she qualifies as indefinitely confined or disabled for an indefinite period. A county clerk may not ‘declare’ that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic,” Chief Justice Patience Roggensack wrote for the majority.

The majority decision stated if voters falsely claimed they were indefinitely confined “their ballots would not count.” But the court did not give license to throw out large numbers of ballots without making determinations about the status of each individual voter, as Trump has sought in his separate lawsuit…

ParlerGabTruth Social
Continue Reading
This website lives off the kindness of your donations. If you would like to support The T-Room please visit our PayPal.

Editor’s Picks

TOAST! NY DA ALVIN BRAGG’S CASE AGAINST TRUMP JUST IMPLODED!!!

Trump Announces Plan to ‘Dismantle the Deep State’…

THIS IS EXCEPTIONAL: The Parliamentary Motive Behind the J6 Fedsurrection…

You Have Witnessed History Today in Moscow and it Is Consequential…

Former IDF Medical Officer and Director of Primary Care at Meuhedet in Israel “Calls for the immediate Halt of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines”…

Any publication posted at The T-Room and/or opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the views of The T-Room. Such publications and all information within the publications (e.g. titles, dates, statistics, conclusions, sources, opinions, etc) are solely the responsibility of the author of the article, not The T-Room.

Twitter Icon

View Old Archives

Copyright © 2023 T-Room

Site by Creative Visual Design