by Katherine Watt at Bailiwick News
Orientation for new readers. Reconstitution starter pack.
New video:
- March 27, 2023 – Kill Box. SGT Report. Todd Callender, Katherine Watt, Sean/SGT report (42 min.)
On March 28, 2023, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) proposed S.Amdt. 11 —
“To require any convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response reached by the World Health Assembly to be subject to Senate ratification”
— to S.316, a bill introduced by Sen. Tim Kaine, originally containing two provisions (largely symbolic) to repeal PL 102-1, Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution and PL 107-243, Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.
S.316 passed on March 29, 2023, with no amendments, by a 66-30-4 vote.
Background:
For more information on the World Health Assembly process for adopting a new ‘pandemic treaty’ and also adopting new amendments to the World Health Organization International Health Regulations that have been in force since 1952 and amended in 1969, 1973, 1981, 2005 and in May 2022 — which are two different but interlocking geopolitical procedures — please see James Roguski’s Substack.
Roguski has done much more detailed research, writing and video presentation about the World Health Organization component of the intentional global fraud and mass murder program than I have, because I focus on the American domestic law components.
Start with Roguski’s Jan. 5, 2023 100 Reasons post, including his synopsis:
The World Health Organization is attempting a GLOBAL POWER GRAB by seeking to have the 194 member nations of the World Health Assembly adopt a completely new international agreement commonly referred to as the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” in addition to seeking to adopt proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
The proposed “Pandemic Treaty” would give the WHO control over “pathogens with pandemic potential” as well as control over the means of production within the Pharmaceutical, Hospital, Emergency Industrial Complex. It is an absolute abomination that must be stopped.
The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations would make the WHO’s proclamations legally-binding rather than just advisory recommendations. The proposed amendments seek to institute global digital health certificates, dramatically increase the billions of dollars available to the WHO and enable nations to implement the regulations WITHOUT respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of people.
Agreement by a simple majority of the 194 member nations is all that is needed to adopt the amendments because, as amendments to an existing agreement, neither the advice and consent of the United States Senate, nor the signature of the President would be required.
These proposed amendments are being negotiated in secret without any opportunity for comment by people from around the world.
I don’t know how the puppet pseudo-government
officials occupying Washington DC classify the proposed new pandemic treaty or the amendments to the International Health Regulations, nor which American constitutional, statutory or regulatory provisions they may construe as providing legal authority for their acts of adoption, ratification and enforcement of such foreign policy instruments.
Roguski offers detailed reporting and analysis in his May 21, 2022 Questions post and March 14, 2023 Truth Bomb post.
Roguski’s work includes pointed legal questions directed at Richard Visek, Acting Legal Adviser to the Secretary of State, and requests for documents, including delegation of authority letters.
Roguski notes that the 2005 International Health Regulations were adopted as a “sole executive agreement,” citing a September 2010 Kaiser Family Foundation report, U.S. Participation in International Health Treaties, Commitments, Partnerships and Other Agreements, at p. 9:
…Among the 26 legally binding international health agreements identified, the U.S. is party to 16 as follows:
Thirteen of twenty-one international health-related treaties: Eight were signed and ratified by the U.S. as treaties under U.S. law (with advice and consent of the Senate), four that address a particular health issue, and four that establish organizations working either directly or indirectly on health issues. Five were concluded by the U.S. as executive agreements, including the International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) and establishment of the World Bank. One of these executive agreements, the IHR (2005), was concluded through a sole executive agreement; the remaining four were concluded as congressional executive agreements…”
For reference, the 2005 IHR are the pseudo-binding international pseudo-regulations that underpin the entire American pseudo-statutory framework for the pseudo-legal global kill box predicated on ‘public health emergency’ government power centralization.
For general information on the differences between treaties and executive agreements, see Georgetown Law Library, Distinguishing Treaties From Executive Agreements
Under U.S. law, the term “treaty” is reserved for international agreements submitted by the executive branch to the U.S. Senate for its advice and consent. Only if the Senate ratifies a treaty by a two-thirds majority may the treaty enter into force.
International agreements that enter into force without the advice and consent of the Senate are often referred to generically as “executive agreements.”
Bear in mind that this generic term encompasses three distinct types of agreements:
- Agreements concluded on the basis of the president’s constitutional authority (executive agreements);
- Agreements concluded pursuant to a statute enacted by Congress (congressional-executive agreements); and
- Agreements concluded pursuant to the terms of a duly ratified treaty…
Back to the United States Congress and the ongoing attempts of members like Rand Paul and Ron Johnson, to break out of their puppet status and act like real statesmen.
On March 22, Sen. Rand Paul proposed an amendment to repeal PL 107-40, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force that purported to Congressionally-authorize US military attacks on all the world’s people, without geographic or temporal limitations, called the ‘Global War on Terror,’ and passed under the 1973 War Powers Act, 50 U.S. Code § 1541.
Like Sen. Paul’s March 22 amendment,…
Continue Reading