• News Categories
    ▼
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

T-Room

The Best in Alternative News

  • News Categories
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

March 4, 2024 at 4:21 pm

A Unanimous Court Stops State Efforts at Disenfranchisement…

2024_Ballot_Challenges_US
ParlerGabTruth Social

by Techno Fog at The Reactionary

This morning, the Supreme Court rejected efforts to exclude Donald Trump from presidential primary ballots.

In December 2023, the Colorado Supreme Court removed President Trump from the state’s presidential primary ballot – a historic first for any state. Judges in Maine and Illinois soon followed Colorado’s lead. Leading up to the Supreme Court’s opinion, there were unresolved challenges to Trump’s candidacy in 14 other states. If even a few of the challenges had succeeded, Trump’s candidacy would have been in jeopardy, the GOP primaries would have been significantly altered, and a handful of judges would have tipped the 2024 election to the Democrat’s favor. It would have been chaos.

Thankfully, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the state-level attempt to influence the 2024 election. The theory to exclude Trump from the ballot was based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which states:

“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.” (Emphasis added.)

A bit of background is necessary to explain the Supreme Court’s opinion…

ParlerGabTruth Social
Continue Reading
This website lives off the kindness of your donations. If you would like to support The T-Room please visit our PayPal.

Editor’s Picks

Joby Wants to Fly a Future-Taxi Off the White House Lawn…So Cool!!!

‘Prince Andrew Was F*ing Underage Girls’ — Tape of Royal Family Advisor Exposes Prince Andrew’s Sexual Relations with Minors and Deep Ties to Jeffrey Epstein…

Cardinal Prevost Elected As Pope Leo XIV…

India on High Alert on Land, Air and Sea…

The High-School Juniors with $70,000-a-Year Job Offers…

Any publication posted at The T-Room and/or opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the views of The T-Room. Such publications and all information within the publications (e.g. titles, dates, statistics, conclusions, sources, opinions, etc) are solely the responsibility of the author of the article, not The T-Room.

Twitter Icon

View Old Archives

Copyright © 2025 T-Room

Site by Creative Visual Design