• News Categories
    ▼
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

T-Room

The Best in Alternative News

  • News Categories
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

July 22, 2022 at 6:53 pm

Democrats’ Inflationary Energy Agenda Killed Climate Bill…

Joe_Manchin_Joe_Biden_John_Podesta
ParlerGabTruth Social

by Michael Shellenberger at Michael Shellenberger Substack

Democrats are furious with Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia for refusing to support climate change legislation. “It seems odd that Manchin would choose as his legacy to be the one man who single-handedly doomed humanity,” said John Podesta, the founder of the Center for American Progress, and point man for the Democrats’ effort to pass climate legislation. “Rage keeps me from tears,” said Senator Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts.

But Democratic leaders have only themselves to blame. They counterproductively sought legislation that would have sharply increased energy prices, and added to the deficit, at a time of skyrocketing inflation, with energy as a major if not main cause. While Democrats pitched their bill as aimed at solving climate change, it was at heart a massive, $300 billion subsidy package for producers and consumers of wind turbines, solar panels, and electric vehicles.

Supporters of the legislation insist it would have reduced deficits and energy prices. They point to the fact that the cost of electricity from solar panel projects and wind turbines declined by 88% and 68%, respectively, between 2010 and 2021, and the price of electric cars declined by 16% annually between 2007 and 2020. In 2020, the International Energy Agency concluded in 2020 that solar power is “cheapest…electricity in history.” And a 2020 Consumer Reports study concluded that the lifetime ownership costs of electric cars were “thousands of dollars lower than all comparable ICE [internal-combustion engine] vehicles’ costs.”

But if solar, wind, and electric vehicles were truly cheaper than fossil fuels and ICE vehicles then Democrats wouldn’t have had to seek $300 billion to subsidize them. Promoters of renewables, including many Democrats, use sleight-of-hand to deceive journalists, advocates, and the public into confusing the actual “system cost” of electricity from electric grids that use a lot of solar and wind with the “levelized cost” of electricity from solar panels and wind turbines when the sun is shining and the wind is blowing.

The high cost of managing unreliable,…

ParlerGabTruth Social
Continue Reading
This website lives off the kindness of your donations. If you would like to support The T-Room please visit our PayPal.

Editor’s Picks

Happy Independence Day!

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act: A Comprehensive Holland & Knight Analysis…

H.R.1 – One Big Beautiful Bill Act…

AFTER ‘8 HOURS OF HOGWASH’ FROM REP JEFFRIES, HOUSE REPUBLICANS PASS TRUMP’S ‘BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL’ – 218 – 214…

Paramount, Parent Company of CBS, Settles Trump Lawsuit for $16 Million over Election Interference After Editing Kamala Harris’s Answers in 60 Minutes Interview…

Any publication posted at The T-Room and/or opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the views of The T-Room. Such publications and all information within the publications (e.g. titles, dates, statistics, conclusions, sources, opinions, etc) are solely the responsibility of the author of the article, not The T-Room.

Twitter Icon

View Old Archives

Copyright © 2025 T-Room

Site by Creative Visual Design