The Left Is Panicking about Explosive Senate Testimony of ‘Provocateurs’ at Capitol Riots…

by Kyle Becker

The explosive testimony of an eyewitness to the Capitol Riots has been entered into the Senate record. And the left is in full panic mode.

J. Michael Waller, the Senior Analyst for Strategy at the Center for Security Policy, was in attendance at the January 6th uprising. His account runs directly counter to what the American people are being told by the corporate media: Don’t believe your lying eyes, there were no radical agitators at the Capitol riots.

Senator Ron Johnson entered Waller’s account into the record and read excerpts from his account.

An eyewitness account that I read excerpts from in today’s hearing provides a different perspective on what, why and how things got out of control at the Capitol on Jan. 6 @jmichaelwaller @fdrlst https://t.co/hp0T2qT8nv

— Senator Ron Johnson (@SenRonJohnson) February 23, 2021

This caused widespread panic on the left, as radical influencers instantly decried the witness testimony as no more than a “conspiracy theory.” But as we are about to uncover together, this was a “conspiracy fact.”

Senator Johnson’s testimony was predictably blasted by Senator Amy Klobuchar. Her snide refutation of the testimony was a trending topic on Twitter.

However, the instant backlash only serves to remind the public: This testimony obviously struck a nerve.

In a piece written for The Federalist that was published on January 14th, Waller provides a clear and concise account about what he witnessed.

“The deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol bore the markings of an organized operation planned well in advance of the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress, Waller wrote. “A small number of cadre appeared to use the cover of a huge rally to stage its attack. Before it began, I saw from my vantage point on the West Front of the Capitol what appeared to be four separate cells or units”:

• Plainclothes militants. Militant, aggressive men in Donald Trump and MAGA gear at a front police line at the base of the temporary presidential inaugural platform;
• Agents-provocateurs. Scattered groups of men exhorting the marchers to gather closely and tightly toward the center of the outside of the Capitol building and prevent them from leaving;
• Fake Trump protesters. A few young men wearing Trump or MAGA hats backwards and who did not fit in with the rest of the crowd in terms of their actions and demeanor, whom I presumed to be Antifa or other leftist agitators; and
• Disciplined, uniformed column of attackers. A column of organized, disciplined men, wearing similar but not identical camouflage uniforms and black gear, some with helmets and GoPro cameras or wearing subdued Punisher skull patches.

“All of these cells or groups stood out from the very large crowd by their behavior and overall demeanor. However, they did not all appear at the same time. Not until the very end did it appear there was a prearranged plan to storm the Capitol building, and to manipulate the unsuspecting crowd as cover and as a follow-on force,” he added in his first-person account.

J. Michael Waller also adds his extensive experience and training by professional agitators. He is highly trained and well-positioned to spot the hallmarks of radicals’ operations.

“I have witnessed and participated in scores of protests since the 1970s when as a high school student I was trained by professional agitators from California,” he said. “Apart from my professional background and experience, nothing in this article is derived from any third-party information or analysis.”

I recommend reading The Federalist’s article in full. But Waller’s is not the only eyewitness account of radical agitators at the Capitol Riot from a highly qualified observer…