by Isabel Van Brugen at The Epoch Times
A Chinese national and businessman has admitted to illegally exporting more than $100,000 in U.S. marine technology for a Chinese military research institute.
Shuren Qin, a 44-year-old marine biologist and founder of a company that sells oceanographic instruments, LinkOcean Technologies Ltd., pleaded guilty in Boston federal court to one count of conspiracy to unlawfully export U.S. anti-submarine warfare devices to Northwestern Polytechnical University (NWPU).
The military research institute located in the northwestern Chinese city of Xi’an works closely with the People’s Liberation Army of China on the advancement of its military capabilities, the Justice Department said.
Qin, who resides in Wellesley, Massachusetts, was arrested in June 2018, and also pleaded guilty on Wednesday to one count of visa fraud; two counts of making false statements to law enforcement agents regarding his customers and the types of parts he caused to be exported from the United States to China; four counts of money laundering; and two counts of smuggling hydrophones from the United States to China.
From 2015 to 2016, Qin exported to China at least 60 hydrophones—devices that can be used to monitor sound underwater—prosecutors said.
Because of national security risks, the U.S. Commerce Department requires a company to obtain an export license in order to ship U.S. goods to NWPU. Prosecutors said that Qin exported the devices to China without obtaining the license, and purposely concealed from a U.S. supplier of hydrophones that NWPU was the recipient.
Prosecutors previously also accused Qin of exporting unmanned surface vehicles and robotic boats, and alleged he had from 2015 to 2018 supplied $8 million in goods to Chinese government-controlled entities.
He admitted to charges only concerning 60 hydrophones worth $100,000. Under a plea deal, prosecutors agreed to recommend a prison sentence at the low end of the 87 to 108 months he faces under federal sentencing guidelines.
The plea was conditional, and Qin may still appeal a judge’s decision to not suppress evidence against him.
Qin’s attorney William Kettlewell had argued…Continue Reading