by Monica Showalter at American Thinker
When you think of everything that’s gone wrong with the U.S. military — from its wokester agenda, to its failure to contain Russia, to its breakdown in discipline, to the presence of Gen. Mark Milley on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, pretty much all of it has the name of Mark Esper, President Trump’s former defense secretary, all over it.
Rather than slink off into obscurity after such a performance, if not back to the big-bucks war-machine defense-contractor lobby whence he sprang, he’s out shilling a tell-all book and promoting it on 60 Minutes in a bid to discredit the man he purportedly “served,” President Trump.
According to 60 Minutes interviewer Norah O’Donnell, he now calls Trump “a threat to American democracy.”
But his interview with 60 Minutes didn’t come out the heroic way he probably thought it would.
Unbeknownst to him, he demonstrated what a coward’s coward and slithering snake he was while in office. Everything he did involved some new means of undercutting President Trump, or, as O’Donnell summed up, “subverted many of the president’s wishes.”
The interview can also be viewed on CBS’s site here.
There were multiple bad things he described doing in that interview, but the summary line that stands out comes near the end when he tells O’Donnell why he stayed in office instead of resigning on principle, which is what decent people do:
O’Donnell: “Critics will say, ‘Why now in a book? Why didn’t you speak out during the Trump administration?'”
Esper: “It’s very simple. If I spoke out at the time, I would be fired, number one. And secondly, I had no confidence that anybody that came in behind me would not be a real Trump loyalist. And Lord knows what would have happened then.”
Why shouldn’t someone who’s busy disagreeing with and working to undercut the president not get fired? Did he tolerate that kind of behavior when he was in the Army himself, or as a top lobbyist for Raytheon? What a hypocrite right there.
Worse still was his reason for not resigning after he decided he disagreed with President Trump on everything — his fear that Trump might get someone loyal to his aims as his replacement, “a real Trump loyalist” as he put it. So the only reason he sat there warming his seat at the Pentagon was to prevent Trump from hiring someone else who was interested in advancing President Trump’s policy aims. What a guy.
The arrogance of his logic comes in the part of his statement that came just before it in the video:…
Continue Reading