Parents, Doctors, and CHD Sue AAP in One of the Most Important Lawsuits in Medical History…

by The Vigilant Fox

It’s time to bring the hammer down.

Guest post by Steve Kirsch

This lawsuit, drafted by California attorney Rick Jaffe, is without exaggeration, one of the most important lawsuits ever filed in modern medical history. I explain why in this must read article.

The plaintiffs accuse the AAP of operating as the central coordinator in a racketeering enterprise involving pharmaceutical manufacturers (Pfizer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur) and affiliated organizations. The alleged purpose:

To promote, financially benefit from, and protect the ever-expanding childhood vaccination schedule through systematic fraud, misinformation, and suppression of independent science.

They argue that this has:

• led to widespread health harm to children,
• destroyed the careers of physicians who questioned the schedule, and
• defrauded families into consenting to vaccinations under false pretenses.

The Core Allegation

The suit claims AAP knowingly misrepresented both safety and efficacy evidence by asserting that the childhood vaccine schedule:

• has been “fully tested,”
• “proven safe and effective,” and
• has “saved millions of lives.”

and that none of these statements are supported by actual cumulative outcome studies.

They accuse the AAP of:

Substituting theoretical immunologic reasoning (e.g., “the immune system can handle 10,000 vaccines”) in place of empirical toxicology and morbidity studies that were never conducted.

The AAP is accused of:

1. Mail and wire fraud spanning over two decades.
2. Conspiracy with vaccine manufacturers to maintain the “illusion of safety.”
3. Systematic suppression of scientists, studies, and doctors contradicting their message.
4. Profiting from vaccines through insurance incentives, bonuses, and “pay-for-performance” schemes.

The suit is filed under:

• 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) & (d) — civil RICO (racketeering and conspiracy)
• 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) — treble damages for “injury to business or property”
• Ancillary jurisdiction for declaratory and injunctive relief under federal civil statutes.

The plaintiffs seek:

1. Declaratory judgment that:
   • The vaccine schedule has never been cumulatively tested for safety.
   • Key AAP statements are materially false.
   • AAP’s claims constitute racketeering predicate acts.
2. Injunctive relief, forcing AAP to publish corrections on its website, HealthyChildren.org, and in its Red Book.
3. Treble damages for lost income, destroyed careers, and economic harms.
4. Attorney’s fees and costs.

The lawsuit

It was written in plain language for the public to read and learn. It’s devastating.

The historical significance is unprecedented…