• News Categories
    ▼
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

T-Room

The Best in Alternative News

  • News Categories
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

May 5, 2025 at 7:05 pm

America First Legal Sues the Judicial Conference of the United States and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to Expose Leftist Lawfare and Enforce Oversight and Accountability…

US_Court_House_AdobeStock
ParlerGabTruth Social

by America First Legal

America First Legal (AFL) has filed a lawsuit against the Judicial Conference of the United States (Judicial Conference) and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (Administrative Office) for unlawfully blocking lawful oversight of core executive-branch functions. This lawsuit seeks to expose the agencies’ ideological capture by the left and restore accountability to the American people.

The lawsuit arises from AFL’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking communications between the Judicial Conference, the Administrative Office, U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, and U.S. Representative Hank Johnson regarding conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

Both the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office denied AFL’s FOIA requests, claiming they “are not subject to FOIA” because they are protected by FOIA’s carve-out for “courts of the United States.” However, AFL’s lawsuit asserts that the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office are not “courts” but federal agencies created by Congress. FOIA requires “each authority of government of the United States,” including “independent regulatory agencies,” to make their records available to the public. Article III of the Constitution limits the judiciary to adjudicatory functions; here, Congress created the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office to engage in administrative and rulemaking activities that fall outside the judiciary’s core function of adjudicating cases and controversies.

Furthermore, the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office engage in the notice-and-comment rulemaking process (a procedure designed for agencies), are subject to legislative oversight, and are not composed of federal judges with lifetime appointments. They can create committees at will, issue subpoenas, and are headed by the Chief Justice, acting in a “department head” capacity — each a core function reserved for the executive branch.

The Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office’s refusal to comply with…

ParlerGabTruth Social
Continue Reading
This website lives off the kindness of your donations. If you would like to support The T-Room please visit our PayPal.

Editor’s Picks

Joby Wants to Fly a Future-Taxi Off the White House Lawn…So Cool!!!

‘Prince Andrew Was F*ing Underage Girls’ — Tape of Royal Family Advisor Exposes Prince Andrew’s Sexual Relations with Minors and Deep Ties to Jeffrey Epstein…

Cardinal Prevost Elected As Pope Leo XIV…

India on High Alert on Land, Air and Sea…

The High-School Juniors with $70,000-a-Year Job Offers…

Any publication posted at The T-Room and/or opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the views of The T-Room. Such publications and all information within the publications (e.g. titles, dates, statistics, conclusions, sources, opinions, etc) are solely the responsibility of the author of the article, not The T-Room.

Twitter Icon

View Old Archives

Copyright © 2025 T-Room

Site by Creative Visual Design