• News Categories
    ▼
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

T-Room

The Best in Alternative News

  • News Categories
    • Surveillance & Technology
    • U.S. News & Reports
    • International News
    • Finance
    • Defense & Security
    • Politics
    • Videos
  • Blog
  • Directory
  • Support Us
  • About
  • Contact

March 4, 2024 at 5:45 pm

CONSTITUTIONAL ATTORNEY’S TURLEY AND MCCARTHY WEIGH IN ON SUPREME COURTS 9 – 0 COLORADO BALLOT ACCESS RULING…

Supreme_Court_Colorado_Must_Keep_Trump_on-Ballot_03-04-2024_2280
ParlerGabTruth Social

Uploaded by Fox News

Today the Supreme Court reversed the Colorado Supreme Court ruling to remove Trump from the state’s primary and general election ballots 9 – 0. This ruling extends to all 50 states and territories including Illinois and Maine whose courts and Secretary of State, respectively, followed Colorado’s removal – “Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse.”

Trump is to remain on the primary and general election ballots.

There is more to this ruling than simple ballot access. As Andrew C McCarthy explains:

In essence, a majority consisting of five of the Court’s six conservative justices (Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh) went beyond the question about state power and ruled that Section 3 can only be enforced by congressional legislation under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment, and that the only existing statute along those lines is the penal law against insurrection, Section 2383 of the federal code.
What that means is that if Donald Trump were to win the presidential election, congressional Democrats would not be able — in the next January 6 joint session of Congress — to refuse to ratify his victory on the grounds that he is an insurrectionist.
Under the Court’s holding, it is now a prerequisite to enforcement of the Section 3 disqualification that a person must have been convicted under the insurrection statute. Congress could change this by new legislation, but there is no chance of that happening in this deeply divided era.

Fox News legal analyst Shannon Bream is joined by constitutional attorney’s Andrew C McCarthy and Jonathan Turley to provide a more detailed explanation of the ruling  –

WATCH:

ParlerGabTruth Social
Continue Reading
This website lives off the kindness of your donations. If you would like to support The T-Room please visit our PayPal.

Editor’s Picks

The FBI Didn’t Investigate the Chinese Communist Party Working to Interfere with the 2020 Election (VIDEO)…

Analysis: Blue-Collar Wages Rise as Illegal Immigration Declines…

Matt Gaetz Exposes Israel’s Secret Nuclear Program and Calls for Its Denuclearization…

What Did Sen Cruz Say About His Reason for Being in the Senate?…

Max Blumenthal Details What’s Happening on the Ground in Both Iran and Israel…

Any publication posted at The T-Room and/or opinions expressed therein do not necessarily reflect the views of The T-Room. Such publications and all information within the publications (e.g. titles, dates, statistics, conclusions, sources, opinions, etc) are solely the responsibility of the author of the article, not The T-Room.

Twitter Icon

View Old Archives

Copyright © 2025 T-Room

Site by Creative Visual Design